So I’ve been trying to build some buzz for MY PREROGATIVE (Which releases on Sept 2.) and in order to do that one of the things I do is troll for reviews. reviews are important not so much because praise is good for the soul (And let’s face it reviews are not always full of praise. LOL ) But because it helps create word of mouth. Word of mouth is what makes an author sales. The reviews are just what help get people talking. So if you enjoy a book, talk about it. Tell friends, lovers, co-workers, about this good book you read. However, with erotic fiction, word of mouth is mostly on the internet because no matter how loud and proud people say they are to read it, it’s rarely the genre people go spreading the word about a great book on. Am I making sense?
This is one of the reasons I often quote my reviews on here. And so far, the reviews have been GREAT! And all from Romance Review sites. Top Pick from Night Owl Romance, Recommended Read from Dark Angel Review, 4.5 Blue Ribbons from Romance Junkies… I admit I was surprised. While *I* think My Prerogative is great, I wasn’t so sure readers would. Because if you’ve read a few of my books, you’ll know by now it’s not often my characters are traditional ones, even if their struggles are basic human nature ones.
However, I received a very nice email from a reviewer at a popular site. I’d emailed asking if they’d received my newest book, and if they’d like a copy of TROUBLE, which they’d never reviewed. The review replied back that she started MY PREROGATIVE, but it felt to womans fiction-y so she stopped. She thought I was a very talented erotica author, but she preferred more romance with her erotic fiction.
All very well an good. The email was nice, friendly and complimentary – and it got me thinking.
I’m the first to admit I’m not an author of traditional romance. Hell, I’m not very traditional in anything I do. I color outside the lines, laugh too loud, and swear way too much. I prefer working nights to working days, and I like to eat pizza for breakfast and oatmeal for dinner. I’ve accepted that aspect of my personality – and honestly, I love it about myself.
Now, back in 2006 when I sold my first story to Kensington for their new erotica line, they asked for erotica. I’d been asked to write an erotica novella, and I did. THE CRIB in the PURE SEX antho, is by my definition, erotica, not erotic romance. But before the book was published,(But after the story was written and in the publication process) the line decided to market Aphrodisia as Erotic Romance instead or Erotica. Now, I knew there would be a backlash, because THE CRIB was not a traditional romance. and while *I* thought the character had a happy ending, it was not a Romance or Relationship Happy ending. It was a mystery solved, emotional breakthrough, type happy ending.
Sure enough, there was a huge internet thing on how Aphrodisia has lied to readers. (and not all about my book, there were several books that the same thing happened to.) When Kensington started buying for the line they asked for erotica, they got erotica…then the line labeled as ER. Romance was supposed to have a Happily Ever After, or even a Happily For Now ending. That was the defining element of a romance novel! I understand the readers upset, and I know myself, by that time I’d already written my second novella for Kensington, and it was definitely more romance, with a romantic happy ending. Because it was now labeling the books ER, and authors don’t usually set out to piss off readers. And I’ve made sure that each story afterwards, for them, was a more traditional romance style. Again, my style will never be all traditional…but the Aphrodisias FEEL more romance style to me when I write them…but in all honesty, I’m not sure readers notice it or not though.
Berkley Heat is a Erotica/Erotic Romance line. They have both, and the feel is more mainstream than romance. At least thats the way I see it. So my Berkley books tend to be a bit more mainstream, but again, they always have a happy ending…which is what everyone cried out was the definition of a romance. After 20 years working as a bartender/waitress, I’ve seen people from every walk of life. I’ve seen ‘traditional’ relationships where people are not happy, and non-traditional relationships that work and the love shines through. But more importantly, I’ve noticed that most of us who work in non-traditional jobs (By that I mean not M-F 9-5 ‘careers’) are often non traditional in what we want from others and from life.
One theme in almost all of my books is that my characters are rarely in traditional jobs. This is mostly because I never lasted in a M-F 9-5 job, and I like to follow the ‘write what you know’ theory. I also know that myself, I’d never be happy with what people see as a traditional relationship. Do I want to love, to be loved, to have family…oh yeah, I do. But the man I fall in love with is going to have accept that I have a few quirks. So the hero’s in my books have to accept that their heroines have a few quirks.
I knew going out with MY PREROGATIVE that traditional romance readers might not feel it very romance-ish because not only is it told mostly in first person by the heroine, the hero isn’t even introduced until Chapter 5. But yes, you do get his POV, in third person, (as you can see here) but even then, he’s introduced as a watcher. The reader doesn’t get to know him, and the heroine doesn’t even meet him until page 99. The romance aspect of it doesn’t bloom until after that.
Their relationship is very non-traditional, I can certainly see why someone would think it non-romance at the start…
My point is that I agree, I do write non-traditional characters, and non-traditional romance, but I still feel it’s romance. And by the ‘there must be a happy ending for the couple’ standard, they are romance as well. But do people who have always lived a traditional life see it that way? I know my editor commented that my romances lack the “fantasy element”. And she wasn’t talking about sexual fantasy, or out of this world paranormal fantasy..she was talking the romance happily ever fantasy.
So, I took the reviews email saying I was a talented erotic author as a compliment. I can see how she thought MY PREROGATIVE was a bit woman’s fiction-ish… but I hope readers also see the romance in it. Instead of being a little bit country and a little bit rock’n’ roll, it’s little bit romance, and a little bit realistic. *hee hee hee*
Tweet This Post